Dear Nanny Smackbottom
There appeared to be some
confusion in last month's issue, regarding my position on bedtimes for naughty
little boys and smacked botties.
Please allow me to explain.
It has always been part of my
disciplinary philosophy to treat adolescent boys (and young adult males) as if
they were at least five years younger than their physical age. Girls, in
general, mature much quicker and as such it is correct that the male should go
to bed sooner and in some cases their bedtimes should be supervised by their
sister or sisters. I would expect that a 16 year old boy under my supervision
would have a bedtime of between 6 and 7 pm with a pyjama time of 4
or 5 p.m. Furthermore, I always prefer to put my little boys into their pyjamas a minimum of 2 hours before their bedtime. If a younger
sister or sisters are around to witness this, then so much the better.
This reinforces the boy's immature
status in the sibling hierarchy in addition, this is why I also endeavour to dress naughty little boys in childish nightwear
whatever their ages. When they have to walk around in front of their younger
sisters for 2 hours before bedtime wearing cute, dinosaur or teddy-bear little
boy pyjamas they quickly lose their aggressive attitudes and respond to
discipline more effectively.
If especially sewn little boy
pyjamas are beyond your means, then a few pairs of female pyjamas from any high
street chain store are an acceptable alternative. You will rapidly discover
that watching a 16 year old boy wearing a pair of yellow teddy bear patterned
pyjamas and kissing his younger sisters night-night at 6pm is very rewarding in
terms of discipline. The girl or girls, should become part of the boys bedtime routine, helping with bath time or perhaps helping
select his most infantile pyjamas and subsequently buttoning up his pyjama top for him.
Perhaps also, have them help tuck
our recalcitrant naughty boy, snugly into bed before kissing him goodnight on the forehead with a warning that he is not to get out
of bed without permission under any circumstances. In addition, having your 12
year old sister drawing the bedroom curtains on a sunny summer evening at 6 pm
as the 16 year-old is encased in pyjamas and bedclothes, is especially
humiliating for the male who is being put to bed and a good way to educate
young siblings early on their lives on how to produce a well disciplined male.
Over the years I have endeavoured to
ensure that the males who have fallen under my patronage, come to appreciate
their subservient role in regard to the superior female.
I have developed the doctrine of pyjama and early bedtime discipline as an excellent way to
achieve this. Naturally during my career, I have used maternal, over the knee
punishments to reinforce my control. However this is a method I tend to use
sparingly, not least because as we know, being placed over a matronly lap for a
smacked bottom can be surprisingly stimulating for adolescent males.
For maximum effectiveness, smacked
bottom time should be delivered in front of several females. I prefer to smack
bottoms in the presence of ladies from my own circle who understand and
appreciate my efforts.
This reserves the ultimate
humiliation of a male going across my knee in front of younger females as an
additional punishment. I always begin with the recipient pyjama clad and then expose the naughty boys bottom by pulling down their pyjama bottoms for further
punishment if the naughtiness warrants.
In conclusion, a spot of corner
time before beddy-byes, with hands on heads and pyjamas puddled around their
ankles is also an excellent, humiliating punishment, especially when younger
females are there to witness such a manifestation of pyjama and early
bedtime punishment's.
I trust this clarifies my position
on bedtimes and spankings for naughty boys.
Yours
Thanks for clarifying, I agree entirely
ReplyDeleteEtta